Data protection Bill
πThe Joint Committee on the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, headed by BJP MP P.P. Chaudhary, has presented its final report on the upcoming bill in both Houses of Parliament on 16 December.
βοΈMajor Recommendations:
βοΈRemove the word βpersonalβ from the existing title of βPersonal Data Protection Billβ.
βοΈ This is intended to reflect that the bill, in order to better ensure privacy, will also be dealing with non-personal data, such as personal data that has been anonymised.
βοΈAmend the section restricting the transfer of personal data outside India to say βsensitive personal data shall not be shared with any foreign government or agency unless such sharing is approved by the central government.
βοΈNo social media platform be allowed to operate in India unless its parent company, which controls the technology powering its services, sets up an office in the country.
βοΈIt proposes a separate regulatory body to be set up to regulate the media.
βοΈJail term of up to 3 years, fine of Rs 2 lakh or both if de-identified data is re-identified by any person.
βοΈThe word βpersonalβ ought to be dropped from the name of the Bill.
βοΈCentral government may exempt any government agency from the legislation only under exceptional circumstances.
#prelims2022 #importantTopics #Polity #CurrentAffairs2022 #UPSC
πJoin @Civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πThe Joint Committee on the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, headed by BJP MP P.P. Chaudhary, has presented its final report on the upcoming bill in both Houses of Parliament on 16 December.
βοΈMajor Recommendations:
βοΈRemove the word βpersonalβ from the existing title of βPersonal Data Protection Billβ.
βοΈ This is intended to reflect that the bill, in order to better ensure privacy, will also be dealing with non-personal data, such as personal data that has been anonymised.
βοΈAmend the section restricting the transfer of personal data outside India to say βsensitive personal data shall not be shared with any foreign government or agency unless such sharing is approved by the central government.
βοΈNo social media platform be allowed to operate in India unless its parent company, which controls the technology powering its services, sets up an office in the country.
βοΈIt proposes a separate regulatory body to be set up to regulate the media.
βοΈJail term of up to 3 years, fine of Rs 2 lakh or both if de-identified data is re-identified by any person.
βοΈThe word βpersonalβ ought to be dropped from the name of the Bill.
βοΈCentral government may exempt any government agency from the legislation only under exceptional circumstances.
#prelims2022 #importantTopics #Polity #CurrentAffairs2022 #UPSC
πJoin @Civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
Pegasus case
πPegasus is a spyware developed by an Israeli firm, NSO Group, to infiltrate smartphones β Android and iOS β and turn them into surveillance devices.
πIt is used as a tool to track criminals and terrorists for targeted spying and not mass surveillance.
πNSO Group has affirmed that it sells the software only to governments.
πThe Supreme Court has set up a panel to investigate allegations of potential surveillance of mobile phones using the Pegasus spyware.
πThe Supreme court has underlined three key imperatives
The right to privacy of citizens
πFreedom of the press including the right of journalists to ensure protection of their sources
πLimits on the usage of national security as a shield by the government to block disclosure of facts related to citizenβs rights.
πThe court cited the Ram Jethmalani v. Union of India 2011 to say that the Government should not take an adversarial position when the fundamental rights of citizens are at threat.
πThe court said that the Union of India may decline to provide information citing security of the State or other specific immunity under a specific statute but they must prove and justify the same.
πIt has set seven terms of reference for the committee such as who procured Pegasus and whether the petitioners in the case were indeed targeted by use of the software, etc.
πThe court has also asked the committee to make recommendations on a legal and policy framework on cyber security to ensure the right to privacy of citizens is protected.
πThe government refused to file a detailed response to the allegations made by the petitioners citing national security as a reason.
πThe government also pled to set up its own probe which was rejected by the court.
πThe court said that such a course of action would violate the settled judicial principle against bias, i.e., βjustice must not only be done, but also be seen to be doneβ.
#prelims2022 #importantTopics #CurrentAffairs2022 #UPSC #Polity #CyberSecurity
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πPegasus is a spyware developed by an Israeli firm, NSO Group, to infiltrate smartphones β Android and iOS β and turn them into surveillance devices.
πIt is used as a tool to track criminals and terrorists for targeted spying and not mass surveillance.
πNSO Group has affirmed that it sells the software only to governments.
πThe Supreme Court has set up a panel to investigate allegations of potential surveillance of mobile phones using the Pegasus spyware.
πThe Supreme court has underlined three key imperatives
The right to privacy of citizens
πFreedom of the press including the right of journalists to ensure protection of their sources
πLimits on the usage of national security as a shield by the government to block disclosure of facts related to citizenβs rights.
πThe court cited the Ram Jethmalani v. Union of India 2011 to say that the Government should not take an adversarial position when the fundamental rights of citizens are at threat.
πThe court said that the Union of India may decline to provide information citing security of the State or other specific immunity under a specific statute but they must prove and justify the same.
πIt has set seven terms of reference for the committee such as who procured Pegasus and whether the petitioners in the case were indeed targeted by use of the software, etc.
πThe court has also asked the committee to make recommendations on a legal and policy framework on cyber security to ensure the right to privacy of citizens is protected.
πThe government refused to file a detailed response to the allegations made by the petitioners citing national security as a reason.
πThe government also pled to set up its own probe which was rejected by the court.
πThe court said that such a course of action would violate the settled judicial principle against bias, i.e., βjustice must not only be done, but also be seen to be doneβ.
#prelims2022 #importantTopics #CurrentAffairs2022 #UPSC #Polity #CyberSecurity
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
FCRA Licence of NGOs Revoked
πThe Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has cancelled the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA), 2010 registration of various non-governmental organisations (NGOs).
πThe FCRA registration of Vadodara-based NGO is cancelled because it was accused of illegally converting members of the Hindu community, funding the anti-CAA protests and for criminal activities to strengthen Islam.
πThe FCRA registration of two other Christian NGOs β the New Hope Foundation, based in Tamil Nadu, and Holy Spirit Ministries from Karnataka were also cancelled.
πThe FCRA registration of AFMI Charitable Trust was cancelled by the MHA for violating the provisions of the Act.
πForeign funding of persons in India is regulated under FCRA act and is implemented by the Ministry of Home Affairs.
πThe FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits the receipt of foreign contributions βfor any activities detrimental to the national interestβ.
πThe Act also held that the government can refuse permission if it believes that the donation to the NGO will adversely affect βpublic interestβ or the βeconomic interest of the stateβ.
πThe FCRA restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(c) of the Constitution.
#CurrentAffairs2022 #importantTopics #prelims2022 #UPSC #Polity
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πThe Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has cancelled the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA), 2010 registration of various non-governmental organisations (NGOs).
πThe FCRA registration of Vadodara-based NGO is cancelled because it was accused of illegally converting members of the Hindu community, funding the anti-CAA protests and for criminal activities to strengthen Islam.
πThe FCRA registration of two other Christian NGOs β the New Hope Foundation, based in Tamil Nadu, and Holy Spirit Ministries from Karnataka were also cancelled.
πThe FCRA registration of AFMI Charitable Trust was cancelled by the MHA for violating the provisions of the Act.
πForeign funding of persons in India is regulated under FCRA act and is implemented by the Ministry of Home Affairs.
πThe FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits the receipt of foreign contributions βfor any activities detrimental to the national interestβ.
πThe Act also held that the government can refuse permission if it believes that the donation to the NGO will adversely affect βpublic interestβ or the βeconomic interest of the stateβ.
πThe FCRA restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(c) of the Constitution.
#CurrentAffairs2022 #importantTopics #prelims2022 #UPSC #Polity
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
Impartiality of the Election Commission
πThe βinformal interactionβ of the CEC and two other Election Commissioners with the Prime Ministerβs Principal Secretary has raised questions about the neutrality of the Commission, especially when elections to crucial States are around the corner.
πThe ECI is a constitutional authority whose responsibilities and powers are prescribed in the Constitution of India under Article 324.
πIn the performance of its functions, the Election Commission is insulated from executive interference.
πIt is the Commission that decides the election schedules for the conduct of elections, whether general elections or by-elections.
πECI decides on the location of polling stations, assignment of voters to the polling stations, location of counting centers, arrangements to be made in and around polling stations and counting centres and all allied matters.
πThe decisions of the Commission can be challenged in the High Court and the Supreme Court of India by appropriate petitions.
πBy long-standing convention and several judicial pronouncements, once the actual process of elections has started, the judiciary does not intervene in the actual conduct of the polls.
#CurrentAffairs2022 #ElectionCommission #Polity #prelims2022
#UPSC #importantTopics
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πThe βinformal interactionβ of the CEC and two other Election Commissioners with the Prime Ministerβs Principal Secretary has raised questions about the neutrality of the Commission, especially when elections to crucial States are around the corner.
πThe ECI is a constitutional authority whose responsibilities and powers are prescribed in the Constitution of India under Article 324.
πIn the performance of its functions, the Election Commission is insulated from executive interference.
πIt is the Commission that decides the election schedules for the conduct of elections, whether general elections or by-elections.
πECI decides on the location of polling stations, assignment of voters to the polling stations, location of counting centers, arrangements to be made in and around polling stations and counting centres and all allied matters.
πThe decisions of the Commission can be challenged in the High Court and the Supreme Court of India by appropriate petitions.
πBy long-standing convention and several judicial pronouncements, once the actual process of elections has started, the judiciary does not intervene in the actual conduct of the polls.
#CurrentAffairs2022 #ElectionCommission #Polity #prelims2022
#UPSC #importantTopics
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
Delimitation commission
πDelimitation is the act of redrawing boundaries of Lok Sabha and Assembly constituencies to represent changes in population and is done on the basis of the preceding Census.
πThis exercise is carried out by a Delimitation Commission, whose orders have the force of law and cannot be questioned before any court.
βοΈConstitutional provisions:
β Article 82: This provides the Parliament with the authority to enact a Delimitation Act after every Census.
β Article 170: This provides for the States to get divided into territorial constituencies as per the Delimitation Act after every Census.
βοΈThe Union government sets up a Delimitation Commission once the Act is in force.
πObjective to provide equal representation for equal population segments and a fair division of geographical areas so that no political party has an advantage.
βοΈIt is appointed by the President of India and works in collaboration with the Election Commission of India.
βοΈIts members are a serving or retired Supreme Court judge, Chief Election Commissioner or an Election Commissioner nominated by CEC and Election Commissioners of the respective state.
βοΈIts function is to determine the number and boundaries of constituencies, to identify seats reserved for SC/ST.
βοΈIt is a high power body whose orders have the force of law and cannot be called in question before any court.
βοΈDelimitation Commissions have been set up four times β 1952, 1963, 1973 and 2002 under the Acts of 1952, 1962, 1972 and 2002.
#importantTopics #prelims2022 #CurrentAffairs2022 #UPSC #Polity
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πDelimitation is the act of redrawing boundaries of Lok Sabha and Assembly constituencies to represent changes in population and is done on the basis of the preceding Census.
πThis exercise is carried out by a Delimitation Commission, whose orders have the force of law and cannot be questioned before any court.
βοΈConstitutional provisions:
β Article 82: This provides the Parliament with the authority to enact a Delimitation Act after every Census.
β Article 170: This provides for the States to get divided into territorial constituencies as per the Delimitation Act after every Census.
βοΈThe Union government sets up a Delimitation Commission once the Act is in force.
πObjective to provide equal representation for equal population segments and a fair division of geographical areas so that no political party has an advantage.
βοΈIt is appointed by the President of India and works in collaboration with the Election Commission of India.
βοΈIts members are a serving or retired Supreme Court judge, Chief Election Commissioner or an Election Commissioner nominated by CEC and Election Commissioners of the respective state.
βοΈIts function is to determine the number and boundaries of constituencies, to identify seats reserved for SC/ST.
βοΈIt is a high power body whose orders have the force of law and cannot be called in question before any court.
βοΈDelimitation Commissions have been set up four times β 1952, 1963, 1973 and 2002 under the Acts of 1952, 1962, 1972 and 2002.
#importantTopics #prelims2022 #CurrentAffairs2022 #UPSC #Polity
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
Multistate Cooperatives
πThe Centre has decided to amend the Multi State Cooperative Societies (MSCS) Act, 2002 to βplug the loopholes in the Actβ.
πAlthough Cooperatives is a state subject, there are many societies such as those for sugar and milk, banks, milk unions etc whose members and areas of operation are spread across more than one state.
πFor example, most sugar mills along the districts on the Karnataka-Maharashtra border procure cane from both states.
πMaharashtra has the highest number of such cooperative societies at 567, followed by Uttar Pradesh (147) and New Delhi (133).
πThe MSCS Act was passed to govern such cooperatives.
πTheir board of directors has representation from all states they operate in.
πAdministrative and financial control of these societies is with the central registrar, with the law making it clear that no state government official can wield any control on them.
πThe exclusive control of the central registrar was meant to allow smooth functioning of these societies, without interference of state authorities.
#importantTopics #CurrentAffairs2022 #UPSC #prelims2022 #Polity
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πThe Centre has decided to amend the Multi State Cooperative Societies (MSCS) Act, 2002 to βplug the loopholes in the Actβ.
πAlthough Cooperatives is a state subject, there are many societies such as those for sugar and milk, banks, milk unions etc whose members and areas of operation are spread across more than one state.
πFor example, most sugar mills along the districts on the Karnataka-Maharashtra border procure cane from both states.
πMaharashtra has the highest number of such cooperative societies at 567, followed by Uttar Pradesh (147) and New Delhi (133).
πThe MSCS Act was passed to govern such cooperatives.
πTheir board of directors has representation from all states they operate in.
πAdministrative and financial control of these societies is with the central registrar, with the law making it clear that no state government official can wield any control on them.
πThe exclusive control of the central registrar was meant to allow smooth functioning of these societies, without interference of state authorities.
#importantTopics #CurrentAffairs2022 #UPSC #prelims2022 #Polity
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
Manual Scavenging
πIt is defined as the removal of human excrement from public streets and dry latrines, cleaning septic tanks, gutters and sewers.
πIn the past, this referred to the practice of removing excreta from dry latrines.
πHowever, new modern sanitation technologies brought new forms of manual scavenging work, which include manual and unsafe cleaning of drains, sewer lines, septic tanks and latrine pits.
πFirst anti-manual scavenging Act was passed in 1993.
π No conviction was ever made under the Act. In 2013, Manual Scavengers and Their Rehabilitation Act was passed which reiterated the provisions of 1993 Act.
πThe offences were made cognizable and non-bailable. These provisions are not implemented effectively.
πOnly when fatal cases come to light, laws are referred to and mostly settled with negotiated compensation with no action on the culprit.
βοΈManual scavenging is regulated by the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013.
β Under this, no person, local authority or agency should engage or employ people for hazardous cleaning of sewers and septic tanks.
β Mechanised cleaning of septic tanks is the prescribed norm.
Safety gear for rare instances when human intervention is unavoidable is prescribed.
β A violation can be punished with two years of imprisonment or fine or both.
β It also prohibits the construction of insanitary latrines.
β Each occupier of insanitary latrines shall be responsible for converting or demolishing the latrine at his/her own cost.
β The District Magistrate and the local authority shall be the implementing authorities.
#importantTopics #CurrentAffairs2022 #prelims2022 #UPSC #Polity
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πIt is defined as the removal of human excrement from public streets and dry latrines, cleaning septic tanks, gutters and sewers.
πIn the past, this referred to the practice of removing excreta from dry latrines.
πHowever, new modern sanitation technologies brought new forms of manual scavenging work, which include manual and unsafe cleaning of drains, sewer lines, septic tanks and latrine pits.
πFirst anti-manual scavenging Act was passed in 1993.
π No conviction was ever made under the Act. In 2013, Manual Scavengers and Their Rehabilitation Act was passed which reiterated the provisions of 1993 Act.
πThe offences were made cognizable and non-bailable. These provisions are not implemented effectively.
πOnly when fatal cases come to light, laws are referred to and mostly settled with negotiated compensation with no action on the culprit.
βοΈManual scavenging is regulated by the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013.
β Under this, no person, local authority or agency should engage or employ people for hazardous cleaning of sewers and septic tanks.
β Mechanised cleaning of septic tanks is the prescribed norm.
Safety gear for rare instances when human intervention is unavoidable is prescribed.
β A violation can be punished with two years of imprisonment or fine or both.
β It also prohibits the construction of insanitary latrines.
β Each occupier of insanitary latrines shall be responsible for converting or demolishing the latrine at his/her own cost.
β The District Magistrate and the local authority shall be the implementing authorities.
#importantTopics #CurrentAffairs2022 #prelims2022 #UPSC #Polity
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
Mekedatu Issue
πKarnataka and Tamil Nadu are again at the crossroads against the Mekedatu dam project in the Cauvery River Basin.
πMekedatu, meaning goatβs leap, is a deep gorge situated at the confluence of the rivers Cauvery and Arkavathi, about 100 km from Bengaluru, at the Kanakapura taluk in Karnatakaβs Ramanagara district.
πIn 2013, then Karnataka announced the construction of a multi-purpose balancing reservoir project.
πThe project aimed to alleviate the drinking water problems of the Bengaluru and Ramanagara districts.
πIt was also expected to generate hydroelectricity to meet the power needs of the state.
πTN has objected over granting of permission or environmental clearance.
πExplaining the potential for damage to the lower riparian state of TN, it said that the project was in violation of the final award of the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal.
πIt stated that the project will affect the natural flow of the river Cauvery considerably and will severely affect the irrigation in TN.
#prelims2022 #CurrentAffairs2022 #importantTopics #UPSC #waterDispute #states #Polity #CauveryWaterDisputesTribunal #River #Map
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πKarnataka and Tamil Nadu are again at the crossroads against the Mekedatu dam project in the Cauvery River Basin.
πMekedatu, meaning goatβs leap, is a deep gorge situated at the confluence of the rivers Cauvery and Arkavathi, about 100 km from Bengaluru, at the Kanakapura taluk in Karnatakaβs Ramanagara district.
πIn 2013, then Karnataka announced the construction of a multi-purpose balancing reservoir project.
πThe project aimed to alleviate the drinking water problems of the Bengaluru and Ramanagara districts.
πIt was also expected to generate hydroelectricity to meet the power needs of the state.
πTN has objected over granting of permission or environmental clearance.
πExplaining the potential for damage to the lower riparian state of TN, it said that the project was in violation of the final award of the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal.
πIt stated that the project will affect the natural flow of the river Cauvery considerably and will severely affect the irrigation in TN.
#prelims2022 #CurrentAffairs2022 #importantTopics #UPSC #waterDispute #states #Polity #CauveryWaterDisputesTribunal #River #Map
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
Indu Malhotra Panel
πThe Supreme Court appointed an inquiry committee headed by former judge Justice Indu Malhotra to probe.
πWhile setting up the inquiry committee, the bench headed by CJI and including Justices Surya Kant & Hima Kohli noted that, this matter cannot be left to one-sided enquiries.
πThe bench emphasised that, matter must be looked into by a judicially trained mind in a bid to submit a comprehensive report for courtβs consideration.
πBefore that, SC had also ordered the Punjab and Haryana HC Registrar General to seize and secure all records related to the PMβs security on visit and keep them in safe custody.
πNow, all the records will be handed over to Justice Indu Malhotra.
πThe Inquiry committee has been set by the supreme court to look into who is responsible for the security breach. Committee will also suggest safeguards, which are necessary for security of the PM and Constitutional functionaries.
πThe Inquiry Committee will be headed by Justice Indu Malhotra.
πIt will also include the Registrar General of Punjab and Haryana Court.
πDirector General of National Investigation Agency or an officer nominated by him, who is not below the rank of Inspector General
ADGP (Security) of Punjab Police.
#CurrentAffairs2022 #importantTopics #prelims2022 #UPSC #Polity
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android :https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πThe Supreme Court appointed an inquiry committee headed by former judge Justice Indu Malhotra to probe.
πWhile setting up the inquiry committee, the bench headed by CJI and including Justices Surya Kant & Hima Kohli noted that, this matter cannot be left to one-sided enquiries.
πThe bench emphasised that, matter must be looked into by a judicially trained mind in a bid to submit a comprehensive report for courtβs consideration.
πBefore that, SC had also ordered the Punjab and Haryana HC Registrar General to seize and secure all records related to the PMβs security on visit and keep them in safe custody.
πNow, all the records will be handed over to Justice Indu Malhotra.
πThe Inquiry committee has been set by the supreme court to look into who is responsible for the security breach. Committee will also suggest safeguards, which are necessary for security of the PM and Constitutional functionaries.
πThe Inquiry Committee will be headed by Justice Indu Malhotra.
πIt will also include the Registrar General of Punjab and Haryana Court.
πDirector General of National Investigation Agency or an officer nominated by him, who is not below the rank of Inspector General
ADGP (Security) of Punjab Police.
#CurrentAffairs2022 #importantTopics #prelims2022 #UPSC #Polity
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android :https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
Assam Meghalaya border dispute
πAssam and Meghalaya share an 885-km-long border. Meghalaya was carved out of Assam under the Assam Reorganisation Act, 1971, a law that it challenged, leading to disputes.
πAs of now, there are 12 points of dispute along their borders. These include the areas of Upper Tarabari, Gazang reserve forest, Hahim, Langpih, Borduar, Boklapara, Nongwah, Matamur, Khanapara-Pilangkata, Deshdemoreah Block I and Block II, Khanduli and Retacherra.
πThe states of the Northeast were largely carved out of Assam, which has border disputes with several states.
πAssamβs border disputes with Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland are pending in the Supreme Court.
πAssamβs border disputes with Meghalaya and Mizoram are currently in the phase of resolution through negotiations.
πThe border dispute with Mizoram recently turned violent, leading to intervention from the Centre.
πA major point of contention between Assam and Meghalaya is the district of Langpih in West Garo Hills bordering the Kamrup district of Assam.
πLangpih was part of the Kamrup district during the British colonial period but post-Independence, it became part of the Garo Hills and Meghalaya.
πAssam considers it to be part of the Mikir Hills in Assam. Meghalaya has questioned Blocks I and II of the Mikir Hills -now Karbi Anglong region β being part of Assam.
πMeghalaya says these were parts of erstwhile United Khasi and Jaintia Hills districts.
#prelims2022 #importantTopics #CurrentAffairs2022 #UPSC #Map #Polity #Geography
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πAssam and Meghalaya share an 885-km-long border. Meghalaya was carved out of Assam under the Assam Reorganisation Act, 1971, a law that it challenged, leading to disputes.
πAs of now, there are 12 points of dispute along their borders. These include the areas of Upper Tarabari, Gazang reserve forest, Hahim, Langpih, Borduar, Boklapara, Nongwah, Matamur, Khanapara-Pilangkata, Deshdemoreah Block I and Block II, Khanduli and Retacherra.
πThe states of the Northeast were largely carved out of Assam, which has border disputes with several states.
πAssamβs border disputes with Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland are pending in the Supreme Court.
πAssamβs border disputes with Meghalaya and Mizoram are currently in the phase of resolution through negotiations.
πThe border dispute with Mizoram recently turned violent, leading to intervention from the Centre.
πA major point of contention between Assam and Meghalaya is the district of Langpih in West Garo Hills bordering the Kamrup district of Assam.
πLangpih was part of the Kamrup district during the British colonial period but post-Independence, it became part of the Garo Hills and Meghalaya.
πAssam considers it to be part of the Mikir Hills in Assam. Meghalaya has questioned Blocks I and II of the Mikir Hills -now Karbi Anglong region β being part of Assam.
πMeghalaya says these were parts of erstwhile United Khasi and Jaintia Hills districts.
#prelims2022 #importantTopics #CurrentAffairs2022 #UPSC #Map #Polity #Geography
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
Hate Speech
πThe growing incidence of hate speeches, especially those targeting minorities, in combination with the judicial ambiguity has provided an opportunity to chart legislative reforms.
πHate speech is neither defined in the Indian legal framework nor can it be easily reduced to a standard definition due to the myriad forms it can take.
πThe Supreme Court, in Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan v. Union of India (2014), described hate speech as βan effort to marginalise individuals based on their membership in a groupβ and one that βseeks to delegitimize group members in the eyes of the majority, reducing their social standing and acceptance within society.β
πThe Indian Penal Code illegally uses speeches that are intended to promote enmity or prejudice the maintenance of harmony between different classes.
πSpecifically, sections of the IPC, such as 153A, which penalises promotion of enmity between different groups.
π153B, which punishes imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration.
π505, which punishes rumours and news intended to promote communal enmity.
π295A, which criminalises insults to the religious beliefs of a class by words with deliberate or malicious intention.
πAmish Devgan v. Union of India (2020), the Supreme Court held that βhate speech has no redeeming or legitimate purpose other than hatred towards a particular groupβ.
#CurrentAffairs2022 #importantTopics #prelims2022 #Discrimination #Polity #Minorities #UPSC
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πThe growing incidence of hate speeches, especially those targeting minorities, in combination with the judicial ambiguity has provided an opportunity to chart legislative reforms.
πHate speech is neither defined in the Indian legal framework nor can it be easily reduced to a standard definition due to the myriad forms it can take.
πThe Supreme Court, in Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan v. Union of India (2014), described hate speech as βan effort to marginalise individuals based on their membership in a groupβ and one that βseeks to delegitimize group members in the eyes of the majority, reducing their social standing and acceptance within society.β
πThe Indian Penal Code illegally uses speeches that are intended to promote enmity or prejudice the maintenance of harmony between different classes.
πSpecifically, sections of the IPC, such as 153A, which penalises promotion of enmity between different groups.
π153B, which punishes imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration.
π505, which punishes rumours and news intended to promote communal enmity.
π295A, which criminalises insults to the religious beliefs of a class by words with deliberate or malicious intention.
πAmish Devgan v. Union of India (2020), the Supreme Court held that βhate speech has no redeeming or legitimate purpose other than hatred towards a particular groupβ.
#CurrentAffairs2022 #importantTopics #prelims2022 #Discrimination #Polity #Minorities #UPSC
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
Criminalising Marital Rape
π A batch of petitions seeking criminalisation of marital rape, has been filled in the Delhi High Court.
πThe petition seeks to amend the criminal law, which includes Section 375 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
πThe grounds for βmarital immunityβ for rape prosecution have emerged from the patriarchal discourse in society.
πUnder the impact of the second wave of feminism in the seventies, Australia became the first common law country to pass reforms in 1976 and after it, many Scandinavian and European countries made rape in marriage a criminal offence.
πSection 375 of the Indian Penal Code, which exempts forceful sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife from the offence of rape, provided the wife is above 15 years of age, also known as the βmarital rape exceptionβ.
πThis exception clause violates the womenβs fundamental right to equality, freedom of speech and expression, and most of all the right to life and personal liberty.
πThe Justice J. S. Verma Committee, constituted in the aftermath of the horrific Nirbhaya gang rape in 2012.
#prelims2022 #importantTopics #MaritalRape #fundamentalRight #Women #CurrentAffairs2022 #UPSC #Polity
πJoin @Civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
π A batch of petitions seeking criminalisation of marital rape, has been filled in the Delhi High Court.
πThe petition seeks to amend the criminal law, which includes Section 375 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
πThe grounds for βmarital immunityβ for rape prosecution have emerged from the patriarchal discourse in society.
πUnder the impact of the second wave of feminism in the seventies, Australia became the first common law country to pass reforms in 1976 and after it, many Scandinavian and European countries made rape in marriage a criminal offence.
πSection 375 of the Indian Penal Code, which exempts forceful sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife from the offence of rape, provided the wife is above 15 years of age, also known as the βmarital rape exceptionβ.
πThis exception clause violates the womenβs fundamental right to equality, freedom of speech and expression, and most of all the right to life and personal liberty.
πThe Justice J. S. Verma Committee, constituted in the aftermath of the horrific Nirbhaya gang rape in 2012.
#prelims2022 #importantTopics #MaritalRape #fundamentalRight #Women #CurrentAffairs2022 #UPSC #Polity
πJoin @Civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
Vikas engine
πThe Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) recently conducted a successful qualification test of its High Thrust VIKAS Engine at the ISRO Propulsion Complex (IPRC) in Tamil Naduβs Mahendragiri.
πThe Vikas engine will power the ambitious Gaganyaan mission into space.
πIt is a family of liquid fuelled rocket engines.
πIt is used in the Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV) and the Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV) series of expendable launch vehicles for space launch use.
πWith this launch, India will become the fourth nation in the world to launch a Human Spaceflight Mission after the USA, Russia and China.
πThe objective of the Gaganyaan programme is to demonstrate the capability to send humans to low earth orbit on board an Indian launch vehicle and bring them back to earth safely.
#importantTopics #CurrentAffairs2022 #prelims2022 #UPSC #Polity #ScienceandTechnology
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πThe Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) recently conducted a successful qualification test of its High Thrust VIKAS Engine at the ISRO Propulsion Complex (IPRC) in Tamil Naduβs Mahendragiri.
πThe Vikas engine will power the ambitious Gaganyaan mission into space.
πIt is a family of liquid fuelled rocket engines.
πIt is used in the Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV) and the Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV) series of expendable launch vehicles for space launch use.
πWith this launch, India will become the fourth nation in the world to launch a Human Spaceflight Mission after the USA, Russia and China.
πThe objective of the Gaganyaan programme is to demonstrate the capability to send humans to low earth orbit on board an Indian launch vehicle and bring them back to earth safely.
#importantTopics #CurrentAffairs2022 #prelims2022 #UPSC #Polity #ScienceandTechnology
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
G23
πIt is a group of Congress party senior leaders who seek reform in the working of Congress party.
πIn August 2020, 23 senior Congress leaders wrote a letter to interim party chief Sonia Gandhi requesting immediate and active leadership and organizational rejig.
πAmid the thinning base of the grand-old party, leaders have demanded a democratic set up within the national party as it struggled to have a leader, post-Sonia Gandhiβs resignation.
πSome of the important leaders of this group are Ghulam Nabi Azad, Shashi Tharoor, Manish Tewari, Anand Sharma, Mukul Wasnik, Bhupendra Singh Hooda, M. Veerappa Moily, Prithviraj Chavan and Kapil Sibal, etc
#CurrentAffairs2022 #importantTopics #prelims2022 #UPSC #Polity
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πIt is a group of Congress party senior leaders who seek reform in the working of Congress party.
πIn August 2020, 23 senior Congress leaders wrote a letter to interim party chief Sonia Gandhi requesting immediate and active leadership and organizational rejig.
πAmid the thinning base of the grand-old party, leaders have demanded a democratic set up within the national party as it struggled to have a leader, post-Sonia Gandhiβs resignation.
πSome of the important leaders of this group are Ghulam Nabi Azad, Shashi Tharoor, Manish Tewari, Anand Sharma, Mukul Wasnik, Bhupendra Singh Hooda, M. Veerappa Moily, Prithviraj Chavan and Kapil Sibal, etc
#CurrentAffairs2022 #importantTopics #prelims2022 #UPSC #Polity
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
Disruptions in Parliament
πDisruption is replacing discussion as the foundation of our legislative functioning.
πThe passionate debate is taking place everywhere other than in Parliament.
πMoreover, the government is considering curtailing the monsoon session of Parliament, if this happens, then all four sessions since last year would have been cut short.
πThe first two because of Covid-19, 2021 budget session because of campaigning in state elections, and the ongoing session on account of disruptions.
πParliamentβs job is to conduct discussions, but in recent years Parliament proceedings are marred by frequent disruptions.
πA PRS (PRS Legislative Research) report says during the 15th Lok Sabha (2009-14), frequent disruptions of Parliamentary proceedings have resulted in the Lok Sabha working for 61% and Rajya Sabha for 66% of its scheduled time.
πAnother PRS report said, the 16th Lok Sabha (2014-19) lost 16% of its scheduled time to disruptions, better than the 15th Lok Sabha (37%), but worse than the 14th Lok Sabha (13%).
πThe Rajya Sabha lost 36% of its scheduled time. In the 15th and 14th Lok Sabhas, it had lost 32% and 14% of its scheduled time respectively.
#CurrentAffairs2022 #importantTopics #prelims2022 #UPSC #Polity
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πDisruption is replacing discussion as the foundation of our legislative functioning.
πThe passionate debate is taking place everywhere other than in Parliament.
πMoreover, the government is considering curtailing the monsoon session of Parliament, if this happens, then all four sessions since last year would have been cut short.
πThe first two because of Covid-19, 2021 budget session because of campaigning in state elections, and the ongoing session on account of disruptions.
πParliamentβs job is to conduct discussions, but in recent years Parliament proceedings are marred by frequent disruptions.
πA PRS (PRS Legislative Research) report says during the 15th Lok Sabha (2009-14), frequent disruptions of Parliamentary proceedings have resulted in the Lok Sabha working for 61% and Rajya Sabha for 66% of its scheduled time.
πAnother PRS report said, the 16th Lok Sabha (2014-19) lost 16% of its scheduled time to disruptions, better than the 15th Lok Sabha (37%), but worse than the 14th Lok Sabha (13%).
πThe Rajya Sabha lost 36% of its scheduled time. In the 15th and 14th Lok Sabhas, it had lost 32% and 14% of its scheduled time respectively.
#CurrentAffairs2022 #importantTopics #prelims2022 #UPSC #Polity
πJoin @civils360
πFor Daily Testπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
Lokayukta
πLokayukta is an anti-corruption authority or ombudsman β an official appointed by the government to represent the interests of the public.
πMost importantly, it investigates allegations of corruption and mal-administration against public servants and is tasked with speedy redressal of public grievances.
πThe Administrative Reforms Commission headed by Late Morarji Desai in 1966 recommended the setting up of the institution of Lokayukta.
πThe Lokpal and Lokayukta Act, 2013, commonly known The Lokpal Act was passed by the Parliament of India in December 2013.
πIt provides for the appointment of a Lokayukta βto investigate and report on allegations or grievances relating to the conduct of public servants.β
πIt also called for the establishment of Lokpal at the Centre.
πThe Lokayukta is usually a former High Court Chief Justice or former Supreme Court judge and has a fixed tenure.
πThe Chief Minister selects a person as the Lokayukta after consultation with the High Court Chief Justice, the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly, the Chairman of the Legislative Council, Leader of Opposition in the Legislative Assembly and the Leader of Opposition in the Legislative Council.
πThe appointment is then made by the Governor.
πOnce appointed, Lokayukta cannot be dismissed nor transferred by the government, and can only be removed by passing an impeachment motion by the state assembly.
#importantTopics #UPSC #prelims2022 #CurrentAffairs2022
#Polity
πJoin @civils360
For Daily Questionsπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πLokayukta is an anti-corruption authority or ombudsman β an official appointed by the government to represent the interests of the public.
πMost importantly, it investigates allegations of corruption and mal-administration against public servants and is tasked with speedy redressal of public grievances.
πThe Administrative Reforms Commission headed by Late Morarji Desai in 1966 recommended the setting up of the institution of Lokayukta.
πThe Lokpal and Lokayukta Act, 2013, commonly known The Lokpal Act was passed by the Parliament of India in December 2013.
πIt provides for the appointment of a Lokayukta βto investigate and report on allegations or grievances relating to the conduct of public servants.β
πIt also called for the establishment of Lokpal at the Centre.
πThe Lokayukta is usually a former High Court Chief Justice or former Supreme Court judge and has a fixed tenure.
πThe Chief Minister selects a person as the Lokayukta after consultation with the High Court Chief Justice, the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly, the Chairman of the Legislative Council, Leader of Opposition in the Legislative Assembly and the Leader of Opposition in the Legislative Council.
πThe appointment is then made by the Governor.
πOnce appointed, Lokayukta cannot be dismissed nor transferred by the government, and can only be removed by passing an impeachment motion by the state assembly.
#importantTopics #UPSC #prelims2022 #CurrentAffairs2022
#Polity
πJoin @civils360
For Daily Questionsπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
Death Penalty
πThe Supreme Court has made the following suggestions on the applicability and imposition of death Penalty in its recent judgment.
πTrial judges should not be swayed in favour of death penalty merely because of the dreadful nature of the crime and its harmful impact on the society.
π They should equally consider the mitigating factors in favour of life imprisonment.
πThe judgement referred to the evolution of the principles of penology.
π Though capital punishment serves as a deterrent and a βresponse to the societyβs call for appropriate punishment in appropriate casesβ, the principles of penology have βevolved to balance the other obligations of the society, i.e., of preserving the human life, be it of accused, unless termination thereof is inevitable and is to serve the other societal causes and collective conscience of societyβ.
πThe Law Commission in 2015, headed by Justice A P Shah proposed to abolish capital punishments. However, the commission had made the proposal only to non-terrorism cases.
πAccording to the commission, India is one among few countries that still carry out executions.
πThe other countries that practice executions include Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, China. By the end of 2014, 98 countries had abolished death penalty.
πIn the case of Bachan Singh (1980), the Supreme Court formulated a sentencing framework to be followed for imposing death penalty.
πIt required the weighing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances relating to both the circumstances of the offence and the offender, to decide whether a person should be sentenced to death or given life imprisonment.
πAccording to the Bachan Singh judgement, for a case to be eligible for the death sentence, the aggravating circumstances must outweigh the mitigating circumstances.
#importantTopics #UPSC #prelims2022 #CurrentAffairs2022
#Polity
πJoin @civils360
For Daily Questionsπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πThe Supreme Court has made the following suggestions on the applicability and imposition of death Penalty in its recent judgment.
πTrial judges should not be swayed in favour of death penalty merely because of the dreadful nature of the crime and its harmful impact on the society.
π They should equally consider the mitigating factors in favour of life imprisonment.
πThe judgement referred to the evolution of the principles of penology.
π Though capital punishment serves as a deterrent and a βresponse to the societyβs call for appropriate punishment in appropriate casesβ, the principles of penology have βevolved to balance the other obligations of the society, i.e., of preserving the human life, be it of accused, unless termination thereof is inevitable and is to serve the other societal causes and collective conscience of societyβ.
πThe Law Commission in 2015, headed by Justice A P Shah proposed to abolish capital punishments. However, the commission had made the proposal only to non-terrorism cases.
πAccording to the commission, India is one among few countries that still carry out executions.
πThe other countries that practice executions include Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, China. By the end of 2014, 98 countries had abolished death penalty.
πIn the case of Bachan Singh (1980), the Supreme Court formulated a sentencing framework to be followed for imposing death penalty.
πIt required the weighing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances relating to both the circumstances of the offence and the offender, to decide whether a person should be sentenced to death or given life imprisonment.
πAccording to the Bachan Singh judgement, for a case to be eligible for the death sentence, the aggravating circumstances must outweigh the mitigating circumstances.
#importantTopics #UPSC #prelims2022 #CurrentAffairs2022
#Polity
πJoin @civils360
For Daily Questionsπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
Bonafide Plea of Juvenility
πThe Supreme Court, while dismissing an appeal challenging the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, held that a plea of juvenility has to be raised in a bonafide and truthful manner.
πThe Court said that if a document of dubious nature is relied on to seek juvenility, the accused cannot be treated to be juvenile keeping in view that the law is a beneficial legislation.
πJuvenile offenders (age below 18 years) are given protection under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (JJ Act).
πUnder Section 7 A of the JJ Act, an accused person can raise the βclaim of juvenilityβ before βany court, at any stage, even after the final disposal of the caseβ.
πThe juvenile justice system concerns children who have conflicted with the law and need care and protection.
In India, a person below the age of 18 years is considered a juvenile.
πMinor is a person who has not attained the age of full legal responsibility and the juvenile is a minor who has committed some offence or needs care and protection.
πIn India, any child below the age of 7 years can not be convicted of any crime because of the doctrine of Doli incapax which means incapable of forming intent to commit a crime.
πMain Objective of the Juvenile Justice System is to rehabilitate young offenders and give them a second chance.
#importantTopics #UPSC #prelims2022 #CurrentAffairs2022
#Polity
πJoin @civils360
For Daily Questionsπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πThe Supreme Court, while dismissing an appeal challenging the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, held that a plea of juvenility has to be raised in a bonafide and truthful manner.
πThe Court said that if a document of dubious nature is relied on to seek juvenility, the accused cannot be treated to be juvenile keeping in view that the law is a beneficial legislation.
πJuvenile offenders (age below 18 years) are given protection under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (JJ Act).
πUnder Section 7 A of the JJ Act, an accused person can raise the βclaim of juvenilityβ before βany court, at any stage, even after the final disposal of the caseβ.
πThe juvenile justice system concerns children who have conflicted with the law and need care and protection.
In India, a person below the age of 18 years is considered a juvenile.
πMinor is a person who has not attained the age of full legal responsibility and the juvenile is a minor who has committed some offence or needs care and protection.
πIn India, any child below the age of 7 years can not be convicted of any crime because of the doctrine of Doli incapax which means incapable of forming intent to commit a crime.
πMain Objective of the Juvenile Justice System is to rehabilitate young offenders and give them a second chance.
#importantTopics #UPSC #prelims2022 #CurrentAffairs2022
#Polity
πJoin @civils360
For Daily Questionsπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
Darkathon-2022
πNarcotics Control Bureau, NCB, is organised in New Delhi the Darkathon -2022 to find solutions to counter drug trafficking through darknet across the globe.
πThe initiative aims at involving students, youth and technical experts to find effective solutions to unravel the anonymity of darknet markets.
π The agency recently smashed three groups of drug peddlers that were operating on the network that is accessed through encryption software which enables anonymity of users.
#importantTopics #UPSC #prelims2022 #CurrentAffairs2022
#Polity
πJoin @civils360
For Daily Questionsπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πNarcotics Control Bureau, NCB, is organised in New Delhi the Darkathon -2022 to find solutions to counter drug trafficking through darknet across the globe.
πThe initiative aims at involving students, youth and technical experts to find effective solutions to unravel the anonymity of darknet markets.
π The agency recently smashed three groups of drug peddlers that were operating on the network that is accessed through encryption software which enables anonymity of users.
#importantTopics #UPSC #prelims2022 #CurrentAffairs2022
#Polity
πJoin @civils360
For Daily Questionsπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO
Kuki tribe
πThe Kukis constitute one of several hill tribes within India, Bangladesh, and Myanmar.
πIn Northeast India, they are present in all states except Arunachal Pradesh.
πSome fifty tribes of Kuki peoples in India are recognised as scheduled tribes.
πThe first resistance to British hegemony by the Kuki people was the Kuki Rebellion of 1917-19 after which their territory was subjugated by the British and divided between the administrations of British India and British Burma.
πUp until their defeat in 1919, the Kukis had been an independent people ruled by their chieftains.
πThe majority of Kukis are Christians. Traditionally, the Kukis were animists.
#importantTopics #UPSC #prelims2022 #CurrentAffairs2022
#ArtandCulture #Polity
πJoin @civils360
For Daily Questionsπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
πThe Kukis constitute one of several hill tribes within India, Bangladesh, and Myanmar.
πIn Northeast India, they are present in all states except Arunachal Pradesh.
πSome fifty tribes of Kuki peoples in India are recognised as scheduled tribes.
πThe first resistance to British hegemony by the Kuki people was the Kuki Rebellion of 1917-19 after which their territory was subjugated by the British and divided between the administrations of British India and British Burma.
πUp until their defeat in 1919, the Kukis had been an independent people ruled by their chieftains.
πThe majority of Kukis are Christians. Traditionally, the Kukis were animists.
#importantTopics #UPSC #prelims2022 #CurrentAffairs2022
#ArtandCulture #Polity
πJoin @civils360
For Daily Questionsπ
πDownload App:
Android:https://bit.ly/3s1S5DU
ios:https://apple.co/3G51zFb
Google Play
KnotBook - Learning App for UP - Apps on Google Play
KnotBook App by Civils360 IAS - Your best companion for UPSC IAS, CAPF & EPFO