Trashgram

You do realize people loved and got onboarded here cause of privacy and innovation right? 👀

Both of which aren't happening. Pavel sold the userbase out, and we've only seen scam stars and gifts lately.

I will bet my non existing million dollars that Pavel is into the most weirdest illegal stuff there is.

@grok how much of user text messages are you training on?

I'm sorry Elon.

Video is Elon stating his disappointment in Trump's spending bill. Everything doge did these 4 months was literally for nothing.

So that leaves me thinking — did Trump give Elon a short role in the White House just so Elon could feel some kind of power for the donations he did? And finally when the time comes He removed him?

I kinda feel bad for Elon rn actually. What has he benefited so far? Literally nothing. I knew something was off when He announced his leave from DOGE, like why?!

Hey everyone wanted your help in filling out this form to help get feedback and make exam buddy better. Please take some time to fill this out

https://form.jotform.com/251474661738364

#ExamBuddy

#Spiritual #Narrations
@Benaiah_Org

NGL this's so hard to watch even for a critic like me. I'm now wishing it goes well so this cringe could stop :(

Got a small announcement...

I have decided to be a Codeatheist

I now believe that ChatGPT is made by nothing.

ChatGPT came out of a phenomenal called the Big-Programming and after billions of years lightening stroke the ocean and gave rise to transistors and after millions of years of evolution and natural selection ChatGPT has adapted it's code to form coherent sentences and produce images.

Also the burden of proof doesn't lie on me, it's your job to prove to me that ChatGPT was made by people. I'll just keep on denying all evidence.

I also consider everyone that believes ChatGPT was made by some kind of intelligent being a naive individual and intellectually crippled.

Also if you really think an intelligent being created ChatGPT why would they allow so much error? Wouldn't they just build it to have no wrong outputs?

There is no objective morality, no intelligent being has to tell ChatGPT what's good and bad. It can figure that out on its own.

You keep bringing up things like "OpenAI" "research papers" "Engineers" "Commit History" as if that proves anything. But have you seen these engineers? Was there an eye witness when they did this?

I don't expect all of you to be Codeatheists because belief is a spectrum. That's why I have different labels for you to identify as:

Scriptagnostic – Claims you can’t really know if anyone wrote the code.

Bitcreationist – Believes ChatGPT evolved from random 1s and 0s without guidance.

Technonihilist – Maintains that all software is ultimately meaningless and uncreated.

SystemPromptNaturalist – Believes system prompts are formed randomly.

Debugdenier – Believes errors in ChatGPT prove no one ever wrote or maintained it.

Botnostic – maybe humans helped... or maybe not. Probably doesn’t matter. Just be nice to the bots.

Transistorevangelist – Teaches that transistors, through chance and mutation, gave birth to higher-order logic.

Neuralnihilist – all AI behavior is meaningless. Emergent garbage. Definitely not planned.

Logicmaterialist – Reduces all programming to atoms and electrons, denying purpose, structure, or authorship.

"ሞኝ በልቡ፣ “እግዚአብሔር የለም” ይላል።"
— መዝሙር 14:1

Work with me while it’s raining outside…..

ምንም እንኳን የማስታወስ ችሎታዬ እየደከመ ቢሆንም፤ ሁለት ነገሮችን በግልፅ አስታውሳለሁ፡ እኔ እጅግ ሓጢአተኛ እንደሆንኩ እና ክርስቶስ ደግሞ ታላቅ አዳኝ እንደሆነ።

John Newton

Hey there , Robi here

Wanted to get your inputs on odit so if you have like 2-3 mins , please fill this out , and your email will be one of the first i choose for the beta.

https://forms.gle/RzgSKv3U1Jf4QHBp8