A. July 1 2020 Felming's Military Intel Call: "" This Has to Stop"" Good afternoon and thank you for being here. • There are some interesting things that took place last night Tues. 30 June. • 99 percent of the people got up this morning expecting the links to be here • We know at 11 pm EDT last night Tues. 30 June all rates were locked in and then everything went dead. • The reason why is that the servers in the US crashed last night Tues. 30 June. • It sounds to me like it was an inside job. • As of 3-4 Pacific time today Wed. 1 July, they still were not up and it was serious. • There is to be a meeting on Fri. 3 July at 5 pm Shanghai time in Shanghai. • Everyone is angry at the US as it seems like the US is preventing this from happening. • This morning Wed. 1 July, I got kind of angry and sent off some emails and accused some of being toothless – even the Elders. • Everyone taken to task. They talk big and make threats – but then nothing ever happens. • Chinese threaten and nothing happens • Come across as toothless and told them so. • Also, made reference that Trump can't control his people and that everyone has their own agenda. • Not doing a good job of working together • I am sure before weekend is out – will be told that it will be held off till after the 4th of July. We have been promised this so many times and only to wake up on 5 July only to find it didn't happen. • I was angry I let some people know that I was. There are some who do listen to me and don't try and to throw me under the bus. • I heard back from the Elders that there is a mandatory meeting in Shanghai with all the Elders and Xi – and if we have not started by 6 am PST Thurs. 2 July, then they are to leave the US. • There are three who have to go in for this to start. They have not been called in at all. We did receive an update call – but not much of one: • He cannot say much for security now, but he's confirming Mr. Fleming's sources saying that rates were locked in early this morning Wed. 1 July. He can't say anything about value day timing for security. • He is confirming Mr. Fleming's sources saying that the RV teams will roll the start out at any moment over the next six days. • He confirmed THIS IS REAL because many different kinds of paperwork are being required of group leaders and group participants RIGHT NOW and they are being told to STAY ON CALL and KEEP YOUR PHONES CHARGED AND ON for the START at ANY MOMENT over the next six days. • He confirmed we are in the LAST DAYS OF THIS RV ROLL OUT, that we need to STAY CALM because IT IS CLOSE. • Mandatory meeting with XI and all Chinese leaders, Elders and Zimbabwe at 5 pm Fri. 3 July Shanghai time. The Elders are to leave the US Thurs. am 2 July if no appointments are being made in the US. • That following Monday travels for Americans would no longer be allowed in China. • checking every few hours to see if have appt or not. If nothing by Thurs. 2 July 0600 PST (9 am EDT) all elders are leaving the US permanently. • Can't say much for security reasons. • Confirmed rates locked in early Wed. 1 July. • Couldn't say much about Value Day • Will roll out to Mon. 6 July. • Confirmed this is real because many different kinds of paperwork being required and told to be on call and keep phones charged. • Need to stay calm because this is close. • That is the last update. If we get anything more from the Elders or what will take place tomorrow or Friday we will let you know. • This may mean we will only be able to exchange currency. B. Other GCR/NESARA/GESARA Events: This morning, Wed. 1 July a large humanitarian group was called in to receive a partial payment. Banks were reporting a shortage of Federal Reserve dollars and coins as they continued to take US coinage out of circulation in preparation for the Global Currency Reset. This am Wed. 1 July the US Dollar Index was dropping quickly, while a digital gold backed ZIM currency went live on the streets in Zimbabwe. UK Chase Bank has frozen millions of accounts - Are they going through a Reset?

USMCA - United States Mexico Canada Trade Deal was effective July 1, 2020. Canada will have a financial blackout from Thurs. 2 July to Thurs. 9 July. US Congress will be leaving Fri. 3 July to Sun. 19 July to take another ""Vacation."" Groups and Paymasters were reporting that there were no appointments as promised on Tues. 30 June, though were told they would have those appointments within the next six days. Six days from now would be Mon. 6 July – which was 120 days before the Presidential Election of 3 Nov. – that would fit requirements that elections be held within 120 days after announcement of NESARA – expected over this upcoming Fourth of July weekend. Fri. 3 July was likely to see President Trump make important announcements at Mount Rushmore about the US Dollar returning to a Gold Standard and implementation of a debt forgiveness law, NESARA/ GESARA. On Tues. 30 June the military reported they had completed over 16,000 arrests of high profile Deep State Operatives – thought to include politicians, DC agency bureaucrats, well-known Hollywood stars, Main Stream Media journalists and news anchors who had been active in Crimes against Children, Treason, trying to stop the RV, redeeming ZIM for the Cabal and crushing the economy for the purpose of negating Trump's chances of being re-elected. Coincidentally also on Tues. 30 June, the Ellen DeGeneres and Jimmy Kimmel TV Shows were cancelled, while Oprah Winfrey negated all plans through the end of 2020. Several months ago the US Military were actively investigating a tunnel beneath the ocean where children were thought to have been smuggled from Oprah's private island to Jeffrey Epstein's Pedophile Island. Attorney General Bill Barr has confirmed that an Intelligence Community-instigated and Comey-led investigation was ""spring-loaded"" to go after President Trump and ""ignored all exculpatory evidence"" – a very serious accusation that could culminate in charges of Treason against big name players including former US President Barak Obama.

Ty

Covering all points of view, as usual...

This is not new news, but it’s from The James Corbett Report, 6/30/20, “Will There Be Bail-ins? – Questions For Corbett #063” In case anyone still is unaware of the status of their funds once deposited into a bank, this will define it quite clearly. Note the statement, “completely changes the rules of banking.” Note, as well, “pension funds that are the target market for the latest bail-in play, called “bailin-able bonds.”

Screenshots begin at 10: 27
https://www.corbettreport.com/will-there-be-bail-ins-question-for-corbett-063/

Year is Nov 16, 2014

The Purge: The Natural Progression Of “Woke” Censorship Is Tyranny

Tuesday, 30 June 2020

As I have noted in the past, in order to be a conservative one has to stick to certain principles. For example, you have to stand against big government and state intrusions into individual lives, you have to support our constitutional framework and defend civil liberties, and you also have to uphold the rights of private property. Websites are indeed private property, as much as a person's home is private property. There is no such thing as free speech rights in another person's home, and there is no such thing as free speech rights on a website.

That said, there are some exceptions. When a corporation or a collective of corporations holds a monopoly over a certain form of communication, then legal questions come into play when they try to censor the viewpoints of an entire group of people. Corporations exist due to government sponsored charters; they are creations of government and enjoy certain legal protections through government, such as limited liability and corporate personhood. Corporations are a product of socialism, not free market capitalism; and when they become monopolies, they are subject to regulation and possible demarcation.

Many corporations have also received extensive government bailouts (taxpayer money) and corporate welfare. Google and Facebook, for example rake in billions in state and federal subsidies over the course of a few years. Google doesn't even pay for the massive bandwidth it uses. So, it is not outlandish to suggest that if a company receives the full protection of government from the legal realm to the financial realm then they fall under the category of a public service. If they are allowed to continue to monopolize communication while also being coddled by the government as “too big to fail”, then they become a public menace instead.

This is not to say that I support the idea of nationalization. On the contrary, the disasters of socialism cannot be cured with even more socialism. However, monopolies are a poison to free markets and to free speech and must be deconstructed or abolished.

Beyond corporate monopolies, there is also the danger of ideological monopolies. Consider this – The vast majority of silicon valley companies that control the lion's share of social media platforms are run by extreme political leftists and globalists that are openly hostile to conservative and moderate values.

Case in point: Three of the largest platforms on the internet – Reddit, Twitch, and YouTube just acted simultaneously in a single day to shut down tens of thousands of forums, streamers and video channels, the majority of which espouse conservative arguments which the media refers to as “hate speech”.

To be sure, at least a few of the outlets shut down probably argue from a position of race superiority. However, I keep seeing the mainstream media making accusations that all the people being silenced right now deserve it due to “racism” and “calls for violence”, and I have yet to see them offer a single piece of evidence supporting any of these claims.

A recent article from the hyper-leftist Salon is a perfect example of the hypocrisy and madness of the social justice left in action. It's titled 'Twitch, YouTube And Reddit Punished Trump And Other Racists – And That's A Great Thing For Freedom'. Here are a few excerpts with my commentary:

Salon: “Freedom is impossible for everyone when viewpoints prevail that dehumanize anyone. And it appears that several big social media platforms agree, judging from recent bans or suspensions of racist accounts across YouTube, Twitch, and Reddit.”

My Response

Freedom cannot be taken away by another person's viewpoint. Every individual has complete control over whether or not they “feel” marginalized and no amount of disapproval can silence a person unless they allow it to. If you are weak minded or weak willed, then grow a backbone instead of expecting the rest of the world to stay quiet and keep you comfortable.

Remember when the political left was the bastion of the free speech debate against the censorship of the religious right? Well, now the leftists have a religion (or cult) of their own and they have changed their minds on the importance of open dialogue.

Salon: “For those who are dehumanized — whether by racism, sexism, classism, ableism, anti-LGBTQ sentiment or any other prejudices — their voices are diminished or outright silenced, and in the process they lose their ability to fully participate in our democracy. We all need to live in a society where hate is discouraged, discredited and whenever possible scrubbed out completely from our discourse. This doesn't mean we should label all ideas as hateful simply because we disagree with them; to do that runs afoul of President Dwight Eisenhower's famous statement, "In a democracy debate is the breath of life”. When actual hate enters the dialogue, however, it acts as a toxic smoke in the air of debate, suffocating some voices and weakening the rest.”

My Response

Where do I begin with this steaming pile of woke nonsense? First, it's impossible to be “dehumanized” by another person's opinion of you. If they are wrong, or an idiot, then their opinion carries no weight and should be ignored. Your value is not determined by their opinion. No one can be “silenced” by another person's viewpoint unless they allow themselves to be silenced. If they are right about you and are telling you something you don't want to hear, then that is your problem, not theirs. No one in this world is entitled to protection from other people's opinions. Period.

It should not surprise anyone though that leftists are actively attempting to silence all dissent while accusing conservatives of stifling free speech. This is what they do; they play the victim while they seek to victimize. They have no principles. They do not care about being right, they only care about “winning”.

Under the 1st Amendment, ALL speech is protected, including what leftists arbitrarily label “hate speech”. Unless you are knowingly defaming a specific person or threatening specific violence against a specific person, your rights are protected. Interpreting broad speech as a “threat” because of how it might make certain people feel simply will not hold up in a court of law. Or at least, it should not hold up...

Political leftists have declared themselves the arbiters of what constitutes “hate speech”, the problem is they see EVERYTHING that is conservative as racist, sexist, misogynistic, etc. No human being or group of human beings is pure enough or objective enough to sit in judgment of what encompasses fair or acceptable speech. Therefore, all speech must be allowed in order to avoid tyranny.

If an idea is unjust, then by all means, the political left has every right to counter it with their own ideas and arguments. “Scrubbing” all opposing ideas from the public discourse is unacceptable, and this is exactly what the social justice movement is attempting to do. If you want to erase these ideas from your own home, or your personal website, then you are perfectly within your rights to do so, but you DO NOT have the right to assert a monopoly on speech and the political narrative.

Generally, when a group of zealots is trying to erase opposing ideals from the discussion, it usually means their own ideals don't hold up to scrutiny. If your ideology is so pure and correct in its form, there should be no need to trick the masses into accepting it by scrubbing the internet.

Finally, America was not founded as a democracy, we are a republic, and with good reason. A democracy is tyranny by the majority; a collectivist hell where power is centralized into the hands of whoever can con 51% of the population to their side. Marxists and communists love the idea of “democracy” and speak about it often because they think they are keenly equipped to manipulate the masses and form a majority. But, in a republic, individual rights are protected REGARDLESS of what the majority happens to believe at any given time, and this includes the right to free speech.

In the same breath, Solon pretends to value free discussion, then calls for the destruction of free speech and opposing ideas in the name of protecting people's thin-skinned sensitivities. In other words, free speech is good, unless it's a viewpoint they don't like, then it becomes hate speech and must be suppressed.

Solon: “Reddit referred Salon to a statement explaining, “We committed to closing the gap between our values and our policies to explicitly address hate" and that "ultimately, it's our responsibility to support our communities by taking stronger action against those who try to weaponize parts of Reddit against other people."”

My Response

In other words, they don't like conservatives using their platforms against them, and since the political left is unable to present any valid arguments to defend their beliefs and they are losing the culture war, they are going for broke and seeking to erase all conservatives from their platforms instead. The “hate speech” excuse is merely a false rationale. Social justice warriors stand on top of a dung heap and pretend it's the moral high ground.

Solon: “No one who understands Constitutional law can argue that these corporate decisions violate the First Amendment which only protects speech from government repression. Professor Rick Hasen at the University of California, Irvine Law School told Salon by email that "private companies running websites are not subject to being sued for violating the First Amendment. The companies are private actors who can include whatever content they want unless there is a law preventing them from doing so."

My Response

Again, this is not entirely true. Corporations are constructs of government and receive special privileges from government. If corporations form a monopoly over a certain form of communication and they attempt to censor all opposing views from that platform then they can be broken up by government to prevent destruction of the marketplace. Also, government can rescind the limited liability and corporate personhood of these companies as punishment for violating the public trust. And finally, any company that relies on taxpayer dollars or special tax break incentives to survive can and should have those dollars taken away when attempting to assert a monopoly.

Yes, there are alternative platforms for people to go to, but what is to stop leftist/globalist monopolies from buying up every other social media and standard media platform (as they have been doing for the past decade)? What is to stop leftist/globalist interests from using the “hate speech” argument to put pressure on ALL other web platforms including service and domain providers to cancel conservatives?

Finally, just because something is technically legal does not necessarily make it right. Corporations exploit government protection, yet claim they are not subject to government regulation? The left hates corporate America, yet they happily defend corporations when they are censoring conservatives? This is insane.

The Salon author then goes on a blathering diatribe about how he was once a victim of racism (all SJWs measure personal value according to how much more victimized someone is compared to others). His claims are irrelevant to the argument at hand, then he continues...

Salon: “Trump threatening to use the government power to retaliate against those companies, on the other hand, is a threat to both the letter and the spirit of the First Amendment. He and his supporters are not being stopped from disseminating their views on other platforms...”

My Response

Here is the only area where I partially agree with Salon. All of my readers know I do not put any faith in Donald Trump to do the right thing, mostly because of the elitists he surrounds himself with in his cabinet. When it comes down to it, Trump will act in THIER best interests, not in the public's best interests. Giving him (or the FCC) the power to dictate speech rules on the internet is a bad idea. Also, for those that think the election process still matters, what if we gift such powers to the government today and then the political left enters the White House tomorrow? Yikes! Then we'll have no room to complain as they will most certainly flip-flop and use government power to silence their opposition.

Of course, if the roles were reversed and corporations were deplatforming thousands of social justice forums and videos, the leftists would be screaming bloody murder about “corporate censorship” and “discrimination”. For now, in their minds, racial discrimination = bad. Political discrimination = good.

The monopoly issue still stands, though, and an ideological monopoly coupled with a unified corporate monopoly is a monstrosity that cannot be tolerated. Government can and should break up such monopolies without going down the rabbit hole of nationalization.

Yes, we can go to small startup platforms and leave Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, YouTube, etc. behind. I have been saying for years that conservatives with the capital should start their own alternative social media. In fact, that is exactly what is finally happening. There has been a mass exodus of users from mainstream websites lately. I say, let the SJWs have their echo chambers and maybe these companies will collapse. Get Woke Go Broke still applies.

But, government can no longer protect these corporations, either. With the government raining down bailout cash and corporate welfare on media companies, voting with your feet and your wallet does not have the same effect or send the same message.

The future of this situation is bleak. I have no doubt that leftists and globalists will attempt to purge ALL conservative discussion from the internet, to the point of attempting to shut down private conservative websites through service providers. The final outcome of the purge is predictable: Civil war; an issue I will be discussing in my next article.

Leftists accuse conservatives of hate, but social justice adherents seem to hate almost everything. I don't think I've ever witnessed a group of people more obsessed with visiting misery on others, and they will never be satisfied or satiated. That which is normal speech today will be labeled as hate speech tomorrow. The cult must continue to justify its own existence. I for one am not going to live my life walking on eggshells around a clique of narcissistic sociopaths. Cancel culture is mob rule, and mob rule is at its core the true evil here; far more evil than any mere words spoken by any “white supremacist” on any forum or video ever.

Brandon Smith

Left-wing media conspires with Big Tech to de-platform conservatives: Now they’re targeting Telegram

(Natural News) While Marxist authoritarians and speech Nazis at Twitter, Google, YouTube and Facebook have been censoring and silencing conservatives and pro-Trump voices for the past few years, the Left-wing ‘mainstream media’ has been cheering the effort.

And now, they’re going after another ‘rival.’

Fake news leader CNN is now pressuring Telegram to begin widespread censorship of its ‘dissident’ culture — users who have flocked to the platform (like Parler) after being kicked off the others for daring to express a different (right-leaning) opinion, Big League Politics reports.

Essentially, CNN is using a Left-wing “think tank” (which it probably conspired with to come up with new ‘research’) to complain about how “white supremacist groups” are using Telegram to (egads!) engage in constitutionally protected speech (yes, even speech that’s deplorable).

Meanwhile, CNN doesn’t bother calling out Twitter or Facebook or any of the other Lefty platforms as being havens for fascists like Antifa who claim to be anti-fascists, or Marxists and socialists who want to destroy America as founded. (Related: Politico blames “white supremacists” for violent rioting, but even SPLC says there’s no evidence.)

The network noted in its “Five Things” column Friday:

5. White supremacy

White supremacist groups have become much more active on the social media network Telegram as protests over racism and police brutality sweep the US. That’s according to a new report by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, a London-based think tank. More than 200 channels, many with thousands of members, include frequent and explicit threats of violence against minority communities and Black Lives Matter protesters, researchers said. White supremacists have made their way over to Telegram because it’s less active in moderating content than other social media networks, the report said.

White supremacists are everywhere, don’t you know, but there are no anti-government Marxists, communists or socialists anywhere in America that CNN can find, don’t you know.

In any event, the implication appears to be that CNN is okay colluding with the big tech behemoths to target smaller platforms that actually promote and enable constitutionally-protected speech, even vile and abhorrent ideologies that few Americans agree with.

Kind of like the speech our founding fathers used when they were fomenting independence back in the day. We’re pretty sure King George wasn’t a fan of it.

“The Institute for Strategic Dialogue partners with Facebook, Google, Twitter, Microsoft, the Soros-backed Open Society Foundations and many different government bureaucracies to lobby for Draconian censorship on social media platforms,” Big League Politics reported, noting the connection between Left-wing media and Left-wing social media.

So far, Telegram is not buckling. The platform told CNN it is “a neutral platform used both by Black Lives Matter and their opponents” and that calls to violence (which are generally illegal anyway) are not welcome there.

This attack on Telegram makes perfect sense because it follows a pattern of Left-wing bullying of anyone and any platform that dares to ‘cater to conservatives’ by simply failing to persecute them for what they say and what they believe.

Twitter and Facebook and YouTube have all claimed at various points during their existence that they are “free speech platforms” designed to provide users with a voice and a forum all their own.

But of course, that’s not really true. Since these platforms ‘got big’ and extremely wealthy, they became powers unto themselves, free (so far) of regulation by federal and state entities because they throw around a lot of lobbying money.

And along the way, the like-minded Marxist ideologies in newsrooms and editorial boards around the country have rushed to their aid — so they can get featured on their well-trafficked Internet real estate (eyeballs equal revenue).

Anyone who doesn’t toe the progressive line, meanwhile, gets cast aside and deplatformed.

As other free-speech sites like Gab and Parler begin to grow in the wake of Left-wing social media purges, expect lapdogs like CNN to take up the cause against them, as well.

Because ‘free speech’ to a Leftist ideologue means ‘you’re free to repeat the narrative I give you.’

I just saw the post from Wil on the Volunteers Group (saw it in the DEC, as well). Hey, I'm all for complete freedom of speech, which includes my right to tell you in no uncertain terms that the garbage in that post was complete and utter nonsense (I was going to say "bullshit," but thought better of it).

Not sure exactly why I always bristle when I see this ridiculous rhetoric/NESARA crap. The predictions - in terms of the way this junk is always phrased, it's more like statements of what is "unquestionably" going to happen - are bad enough (they never, ever come to pass. EVER). But exclaiming, for example, "a digital gold backed ZIM currency went live on the streets in Zimbabwe," as if stating a fact that already happened, shows how absurd this pile of desultory dung really is.

And that's about as respectful as I can put it. I'm sure Wil has a good heart, just as some of the friends I have that also have been buying into this fairy tale for the last twenty years or so.

Agreed fully... I warned him of this a year ago and nothing has happened ;)