RattleTrap 1776 🇺🇸
161K subscribers
10.7K photos
1.32K videos
2.31K links
Download Telegram
Throwback…

When you’re feeling stupid, there’s always something that’ll out stupid ya 😉

I have NEVER said Roosevelt served 4 full terms.

But yes, Donna the Hollow Cranium, 13 years is a 4th term. 💯🎯🤡
How many til it’s mathematically impossible? 🎯
“When the plan falls apart, who leads?” Because in high-stakes environments, it’s not always the person with the rank. It’s the person with the clarity.

- former Navy SEAL of 21 years.

This is a great read for those who want to contribute to the fight versus the twats who display their insecurities by attacking others providing clarity. 🤭🔥

5 Steps:
https://www.fastcompany.com/91328886/navy-seal-strategies-to-turn-stress-into-success
Normies think it’s the same person 🤦🏽🤭
🫡♟️🇺🇸
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Military Industrial Complex and Libtards just can’t seem to explain why the most recent National Security Strategy archived on the Department of Defense is 2017…

How come every other President had one except “Biden”?

I know 👉🏻 —————

👉🏻 45——47 🫡♟️🇺🇸
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Respect for the Supreme Commander 🫡♟️🇺🇸
This is why they say, “the ending is not for everyone”…

Americans will not allow their little IQs to believe that these people are not the same.

That’s sad.

To want cleanout of corruption and evil, but cannot see it displayed right in front of them.

Literally. 🤦🏽🤷🏽‍♂️
Check their Daddy’s DNA 🔥🤣
I made this for ALL those who’ve struggled with family and friends who are all Military Industrial Complex Veterans and Attorneys who know “everything” but actually don’t know much ado at all.

You’ve all been CHALLENGED to explain WHY ALL these Laws and Orders from 2015 to 2025 fit into a chronological order and keep validating each other year by year.

If you wanna run with the big dawgs, you gotta know what we feed on.

👉🏻 ———

👉🏻 45——47 🫡♟️🇺🇸

Challenged:
https://rumble.com/v6tc779-challenge-by-derek-johnson-rattletrap1776-may-12-2025.html
Dear Military Industrial Complex,

Here’s all the Military Oaths in United States history.

1 June 1789
1st Cong., 1st sess.,
statute 1, chap. 1

Officer Oath: “I, A.B., do solemnly swear or affirm (as the case may be) that I will support the Constitution of the United States.”

The very first law of the United States identified the requirement for government officials to take an oath or affirmation according to Article 6 of the Constitution.

29 September 1789
1st Cong., 1st sess.,
statute 1, chap. 25

Enlisted Oath: “I, A.B., do solemnly swear or affirm (as the case may be) to bear true  faith and allegiance to the United States of America, and to serve them honestly and faithfully against all their enemies or opposers whatsoever, and to observe and obey the orders of the president of the United States of America, and the orders of officers appointed over me.”

This statute separated the military oath from the oath for other public officials.

It also created an oath for enlisted personnel distinct from the officer's oath, with an allegiance to the United States rather than the Constitution and a requirement to obey the orders of their chain of command.

The officer's oath mirrored the oath specified in statute 1, sec. 1 for members of Congress.

30 April 1790 1st
Cong., 2d sess.,
statute 2, chap. 10

Officer and Enlisted Oath: “I, A.B., do solemnly swear or affirm (as the case may be) to bear true faith and allegiance to the United States of America, and to serve them honestly and faithfully against all their enemies or opposers whomsoever, and to observe and obey the orders of the president of the United States of America, and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to the articles of war.”

This statute, passed as the means to continue the military establishment, required both officers and enlisted personnel to take the same oath.

On 3 March 1795, the last phrase changed to 'according to the rules and articles of war.' Each new Congress would repeal the previous Congresses act and pass a new statute creating the military establishment, including a section on the oath.

In 1815 (13th Cong., 3d sess.), Congress no longer duplicated the previous military- establishment act and identified changes only to previous law establishing the military.

2 July 1862
37th Cong., 2d sess.,
chap. 128

Officer Oath: “I, A.B., do solemnly swear  (or affirm) that I have never voluntarily borne arms against the United States since I have been a citizen thereof; that I have voluntarily given no aid, countenance, counsel, or encouragement to persons engaged in armed hostility thereto; that I have neither sought nor accepted nor attempted to exercise the functions of any officers whatever, under any authority or pretended authority in hostility to the United States; that I have not yielded a voluntary support to any pretended government, authority, power or constitution within the United States, hostile or inimical thereto. And I do further swear (or affirm) that, to the best of my knowledge and ability, I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States, against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter, so help me God.”

The intent of this Civil War statute was to ensure that government officials were not supporting, or had not supported, the Confederacy. This Ironclad Test Oath greatly expanded and contained more detail than previous oaths. The statute also separated the officer oath from the enlisted oath, once again making the officer oath consistent with the oath of public officials.

11 July 1868 
40th Cong., 2d sess.,
chap. 139 

Officer Oath: “I, A.B.