#MeToo 🤣

What did Goldman Sachs say again? 🤭

Who’s listening to Daddy? 🤭🔥

(Alastair) Finlan characterizes SF via three propositions: (1) that they are fundamentally different than conventional units (or even their elite versions, many of which are lumped under the US SOF umbrella today, such as the US Army’s Ranger Regiment) and that because they were first developed in World War II, they are “out of time” with respect to classic military theories and therefore not included in them; (2) that SF do not conform to traditional models of war, most notably the annihilation (seeking to destroy your enemy) or attrition (seeking to wear your enemy out) models; and (3) that SF are “defined by a technology fusion that could only occur once a certain level of technological development had been reached”—  

In the modern world, however, technologies abound that offer direct lines to adversary populations that can be exploited—not to bring about the military defeat of the enemy, but “rather to create a moment of intense political, military, and social vulnerability of a paralyzing kind that opens space for a third outcome on the peace/war continuum: not victory or defeat, but accommodation.

CNA:
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1145674.pdf  

Strategically Planned.

Swamp Draining.

Justice being served.

👉🏻 ———

👉🏻 45——47 🫡🇺🇸

Funny, but not funny eh? 💯

This is all strategic… but the average every day Liberals are the ones that act like they don’t flip flop.

Hypocrisy at its deepest depths. 💩💯

Had a threat earlier from a no picture and no real name account.

3 words for those spineless weasels. 💯🤫

And he knows who’s loyal and fighting for the right reasons 🫡🇺🇸