Dear Libcucks: Those posting "Not celebrating the 4th because I'm ashamed of my Country."

You should be deported. Your level of ignorance, hatred, and stupidity is unprecedented and your whole basis display the polar opposite of our Nation and Her History.

Using terms like: Constitution, Laws, Orders, Executive Orders, but have not one iota of their origin.

You NEVER mention, 'the Declaration of Independence.'

You use the term 'Constitution,' but cannot quote a single line from it.

EVERYTHING that you benefit from today stems from the Revolutionary Foundation.

The Revolutionary War kicked off April 19, 1775.
The Army was established June 14, 1775.
The First War Articles (Military Law), June 30, 1775.
The Navy, Oct. 13, 1775.
The Marine Corps, Nov. 10, 1775.
The Union Jack Flag, Dec. 3, 1775.
The Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776.
The Flag Sworn in as the official Flag of the U.S., June 14, 1777.
The Articles of Confederation, Nov. 15, 1777.
The Constitution, Sept. 17, 1787.
The Federalist Papers, Oct. 1787 - Aug. 1788.
The Constitution enacted, March 4, 1789.
The Bill of Rights, Dec. 15, 1791.

The WHOLE premise of why you are here (white, black, hispanic, spanish, french, english, mixed, christian, buddhist, atheist, straight, gay, lonely, ugly, poor, rich, whatever the hell you are or think you are)... is because of THAT Foundation.

The Founders started a WAR without ANY Declaration and Literature.

Our whole premise was founded via a REVOLUTIONARY WAR.

The Declaration of Independence was 'DECLARED,' 7 years before the War ended.

The Constitution would not have LIFE or PRECEDENT without that War, the Declaration and Ideologies of those SAME men.

The Constitution is a FRAMEWORK. It is not a detailed blueprint, but rather a foundational document that outlines the basic principles and processes of governance.

It leaves room for interpretation and adaptation through laws, court decisions, and constitutional amendments.

It establishes fundamental principles such as the rule of law, separation of powers, and federalism.

You fools claim we're a 'democracy'...

By definition, a republic is a representative form of government that is ruled according to a charter, or constitution, and a democracy is a government that is ruled according to the will of the majority.

I guess that's why Article 4 Section 4 of the CONSTITUTION outlines we are a Republic.

NOWHERE in the:

Declaration.
Articles of Confederation.
Constitution.
Bill of Rights.

Will you find the term: 'democracy.'

The only place you find the term is in the Federalist Papers where the Father of the Constitution was adamantly against democracies calling them dangerous.

Excerpt from Federalist Paper #10:

"...From this view of the subject it may be concluded that a pure democracy, by which I mean a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person, can admit of no cure for the mischiefs of faction.

A common passion or interest will, in almost every case, be felt by a majority of the whole; a communication and concert result from the form of government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual.

Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.

Theoretic politicians, who have patronized this species of government, have erroneously supposed that by reducing mankind to a perfect equality in their political rights, they would, at the same time, be perfectly equalized and assimilated in their possessions, their opinions, and their passions.

A republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place, opens a different prospect, and promises the cure for which we are seeking.

Let us examine the points in which it varies from pure democracy, and we shall comprehend both the nature of the cure and the efficacy which it must derive from the Union.

The two great points of difference between a democracy and a republic are: first, the delegation of the government, in the latter, to a small number of citizens elected by the rest; secondly, the greater number of citizens, and greater sphere of country, over which the latter may be extended."

"...Hence, it clearly appears, that the same advantage which a republic has over a democracy, in controlling the effects of faction, is enjoyed by a large over a small republic,--is enjoyed by the Union over the States composing it."

Madison, the author, argued that factions could threaten individual rights and the common good, leading to instability and injustice.

He argues that democracies are prone to turbulence and contention, suggesting that they tend to be unstable and harmful to personal security.

Factions and Majority Tyranny: Madison argued that in a small, direct democracy, a majority united by a common passion or interest could easily form and then sacrifice the rights of the minority or an individual.

Instability and Violence: He believed such democracies were often characterized by "spectacles of turbulence and contention," leading to instability and endangering personal security and property rights.

Impulsiveness and Lack of Deliberation: Madison felt that numerous assemblies could be swayed by emotion rather than reason, famously stating that "had every Athenian citizen been a Socrates, every Athenian assembly would still have been a mob."

Federalist Paper #14 talks against democracy too.

You do know that James Madison is known as the Father of the Constitution, correct?

The same Father of the Constitution was the author of the 'Bill of Rights.'

Madison and the other Framers believed that we have natural rights and they are too numerous to list. So, writing a list would be counterproductive.

However, opponents of the ratification of the Constitution objected that it contained no bill of rights.

So, in order to secure ratification, Madison agreed to support adding a bill of rights, and even served as its author.

He resolved the dilemma mentioned in Item 2 above by including the 9th Amendment, which states that just because a right hasn’t been listed in the Bill of Rights doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist.

You Liberals look stupid to even try to use the 'Constitution' as a reference...

You look even more ignorant when you claim you have a 'First Amendment' equal to mine...

Marbury vs. Madison, 1803; the Father of the Constitution having to go into the Supreme Court in which he established to explain what a 'Law' was...

"A law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument."

So, using the 'Constitution' and '1st Amendment' as your references in ANY kind of conversation that doesn't reflect your support of what's currently invoked in Laws and Orders that SUPPORTS the Constitution that's ridding the world of corruption...

Means you're a foreign entity as described in the addition of 'foreign and domestic' to the OATH in July 1862.

Added due to a time of uncertain and shifting loyalties which became known as the "Ironclad Test Oath." The Oath required civilian and military officials to swear or affirm that they had never aided or encouraged “persons engaged in armed hostility” against the United States. Government employees who swore falsely would be prosecuted for perjury and forever denied federal employment.

The Declaration says:

"...That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

The past 9 years CURRENT INVOKED Laws and Orders outline:

👉🏻 Special Operations, Unconventional and Irregular Warfare.

👉🏻 Military Government, Military Occupation, and Continuity of Government.

👉🏻 Government in Exile and Puppet State.

BIPARTISAN with MULTIPLE Generals, Leaders, and World Leaders.

It was displayed that "Biden" had "Democratic control of the House and Senate" from 2021—2023...

Yet continued 8 Executive Orders with 8 National Emergencies by PDJT, that would've automatically terminated in 2 years by law?

Those are:
Deporting Illegal Migrants
Enforcing Election Interference
Enforcing DOGE
Taking back the Panama Canal
Eliminating Stock and Trader fraud
Combatting all forms of Human Rights Abuse
Eliminating all Lawfare
Destroying Big Pharma, Opioids and Illicit Drugs
Combatting all forms of Trafficking

That's just a SMIDGEN of the Operation taking place.

Liberals, you are an enemy and disgrace to The united States of America, us Veterans, and Memorial Graves across this land, that gave you the "right" to act like fools.

And if you’re a Veteran acting as such, you’re just as much equal an enemy and violation of the Oath you took erroneously or with wrong motives. 🤫

Not one single Democrat City, Governor, Mayor, and their Libtard delinquents, especially the Ghettos, should light one Firework tonight.

If they can light money on fire and burn money after and while bitchin’ about a Nation and President they trash… yet know NOTHING about the History much less Economics…

They should be arrested and treated like the Foreign Entities they’re acting like as the term Foreign derived in the Ironclad Test Oath in 1862.

Alligator Alcatraz can hold enemies of the Republic too. 💯🎯🇺🇸

May the Liberals eat 💩 today instead of hot dogs 💯🫡🇺🇸

Army Brothers and Sisters, need to find this guys account and find out what patch he’s wearing, and I’ll bust him via JAG.

Here’s his traitor ass face

These are the clowns I talk about that don’t know why they served.

Using the Constitution COMPLETELY out of context while under Oath.

Let’s find this clown and let JAG have it. 😎🇺🇸

Maybe he is AI; but there’s some like him.

President Trump could have the cure for Cancer and Liberals would burn down St. Jude’s 💯💩

Deport Liberals. 💯🎯