Four “Chinese Balloons” up and nobody gives a damn. 😆

I’ve got so many of these on file with the SAME Call Sign as the February 3-4, 2023, balloon they made all the sheep suck on a distraction pacifier for a month and even flock outside to look up to try to see.

But not the others to present day.

“Baa Baa black sheep have you any wool?”

“Yes sir, yes sir, an America full.” 😝☑️

Copied from article:

3a. Assassination This is clearly a violent, illegal political (and operational) activity. However, there are nuances as to how and when it occurs, and this activity provides a useful illustrative example of how activities and actors do not fall neatly into contrived bins. Every act of assassination requires individual or conspiratorial secrecy to hide the intent before the action occurs; a (clandestine) concealment of what is to occur before the fact. In most cases a low-visibility posture is preferable upon final approach to the target to minimize the chances of scrutiny and intervention by security forces, passersby, etc. The act itself can be a decidedly overt political one (e.g. Austrian Archduke Ferdinand in 1914). Even when a death is obvious (e.g. car “accidents,” “heart attacks,” etc.), the actual cause of death may hide the fact that it was a deliberate, clandestine assassination mission. Oftentimes, and for obvious reasons, sponsors are likely to wish to remain unknown (covert). Therefore, overt, low visibility, clandestine and covert aspects represent a mix of characteristics for activities like assassination; it is not simply a “clandestine” activity. Nor is the categorization of the actor necessarily clear cut. Consider this realistic example:  

Imagine a resistance member “Farmer Joe”, a full-time farmer, living in a rural area who transports his goods by truck into the regional town center once a month for sale. In his home village he is considered an elder whose wisdom and counsel is respected. When times are hard he knows the right people to make sure no one from his village will go hungry, or without shoes, or medicine or a bed. 

If the government needed someone to speak for the village he would certainly be elected by his neighbors to do so. He can also be trusted to look after village security, has setup a neighborhood watch and has enlisted volunteers to put out fires and run off the occasional predator. Unbeknownst to the entire village, he can also muster perhaps six others who are loyal enough to him that they are willing to break the law. In fact, as a small band they have been conducting criminal raids on local landlords’ properties to conduct acts of harassing and dispiriting vandalism, sabotage the landlords’ vehicles and communications, and to steal whatever they can for immediate use, sale or hide it for later use.  

During his monthly trips to town, he stops and talks to select neighbors, friends, acquaintances and business partners. Once in town, a portion of his items are unobtrusively dropped off at a town charity for sorting, packaging and further transport to worthy recipients before taking the bulk of his goods to market. After the market is concluded, he dines or drinks tea with other associates before heading back to his home village. The gathering includes some from the town, some from other towns and regions, and not a few who have business or other interests in even far-flung locales. The farmer relates every relevant and interesting subject and they all agree that some of what they have experienced and hope will be relayed to the farmer’s associates on his return trip to his home. They make contingencies for alternate places and times should they not be able to make it next time. They make sure they know a couple of ways to get back in touch. Before he leaves, the farmer gives a list of hard-to-find items that his village needs, as well as giving a share of the proceeds from the sale of his goods to the far-flung associates.  

On his way home, he stops off at select spots to share the news and drop off some prized acquisitions from town. He also pays attention to what he observes on this return route; looking for vehicles that might have followed him from town. Once at home, he musters his small band, retrieving some of the dynamite he keeps on hand for removing stumps. He ensures everyone is armed and leads them over paths in the forest to some hidey holes for more dynamite and equipment, before heading to a bridge over a deep ravine.

After placing lookouts, he and a helper place the dynamite on the bridge and wait for a text messages that will tell him when some government VIP will return to the capitol via the bridge. As he crosses it, the dynamite is detonated; the bridge collapses and the VIP is dead. They then quietly return to village life.  

Farmer Joe is an assassin. He is not really conducting activities where others can’t because of state repression, so by that criteria he doesn’t technically belong to the underground. However, one could argue he is at least connected to what we think of as “the underground.” He is also an auxiliary, a member of the “shadow government,” and most definitely a member of an “armed force.” He is an intelligence collector, a transport agent, a security organizer, part of a communications network, contributor and patron of the local area complex, etc. His many roles cut across all components of the resistance. It further shows that assassination and clandestine activities do not “belong” to the underground.

3b. Forming favorable public opinion Every means of conveying a message from one human to another is a method of forming opinions. These methods are a normal, routine and inseparable part of human life – not the specialized purview of undergrounds. There is also a significant difference between what this activity means at the tactical and strategic levels. As a tactical concern, this should connote a list of techniques. At the strategic level, this can be interpreted as an objective (or objectives). Tactically, Farmer Joe is engaging in muddy boots, retail communication to the “public,” which is a function partly of his individual interpersonal skills, and partly what he represents as an exemplar of a political position. Do the raids on local landlords by persons unknown contribute to a local, favorable public opinion or can such actions be shaped to do so? How does or could the assassination of a government VIP in some provincial locale affect public opinion in the regional town, the capitol or to international audiences? How do open, legal indigenous political parties, apolitical opportunists or foreign meddlers exploit the events? “Resistance” in many ways is an art. Most of these permutations have nothing to do with the underground, and apart from the clandestine nature of “hidden agendas” have nothing to do with being clandestine.  

3c. Advocating national cause This specific goal is out-of-place in a generic list of activities because not all grievances and attempts to address or leverage them are “national” in nature. It would be much more appropriate to outline how different narratives are used by the resistance to address the motivating concerns of specific target audiences, and how all such approaches properly synchronized contribute to resistance initial, intermediate and strategic objectives. The Marxist Viet Cong example of downplaying the overall Communist national objectives and emphasizing local grievances is instructive.  

3d. Creation of distrust of established institutions This is the second of only three examples throughout the entire model where a deliberate act of “creation” as opposed to exploitation of something is stated. Are there subtle differences between leveraging and creating for resistance cadre? In any case, this is redundant with layer #2 above.

#2: Creation of atmosphere of wider discontent through propaganda, lies, and political and psychological effort: discrediting government, police and military authorities  

Whatever the initial spark of resistance, an early generic purpose of a resistance pursuing goals is the exploitation of the prevailing base atmosphere.

Resistance will seek ways to widen discontent using propaganda, lies and political and psychological effort; discrediting government, police and military authorities; forming favorable opinions in key target audiences to support resistance goals; fomenting distrust of established institutions; provoking agitation, unrest and disaffection; organizing and supporting strikes, riots and disorders; sapping morale of government, administration, police and military members; generalized sabotage; select and carefully synchronized specific acts of  sabotage, terror, assassinations, bombings and other political violence. This “creation” of effects is the key “subversion azimuth” that characterizes resistance. Note that the description above is largely synthesized from the activities spread throughout the pyramid. Any of these activities can occur at any point during the course of a resistance effort. They will be limited or expanded in scale and effectiveness as a function of the conditions specific to that resistance context. Note, too, that in the pyramid there are only three instances of the verb to “create” or its equivalent. This means that the SORO model reflects expansion or replication versus creation of wholly new activities. The height and width of the model is largely a sedimentary pile of layers of repeated similar activities. To the extent that the proportions of what is purported to be “clandestine” and “underground” is visually influential it is, in fact, largely an optical illusion of redundant (or continuous) content piled higher and deeper. Although most of these activities at some specific times, and some of these activities at most times, will require some clandestine aspects to execute, they are inherently political and organizational functions and effects. They are not inherently functions of the need to act in a clandestine manner. Therefore they do not “belong” to a supposed “class of clandestine activities.” They are not the purview of the underground.”

Now, you can find my video breakdown that more than clearly shows how it’s the above.

But as always you must know ALL the Blueprint surrounding that day or you’ll look like a fool by commenting.

This is for those who know the Blueprint surrounding that day.

The past 9 years via CURRENT and invoked Laws and Orders more than clearly outline:

👉🏻 Special Operations, Unconventional and Irregular Warfare.

👉🏻 Military Government and Continuity of Government.

👉🏻 Government in Exile and Puppet State.

BIPARTISAN with 70 plus World Leaders to rid the world of corruption of Republicans and Democrats aka Bureaucrats.

Special Operations and Tactics are needed to flip societal institutions, norms, and thinking.

The DASH is an Operation not a “Presidency”.

👉🏻 ———

👉🏻 45——47 🫡♟️🇺🇸

Special Warfare dot Mil:
https://www.swcs.mil/Portals/111/30-3_JUL_SEP_2017.pdf

Because the mainstream public have no idea what this ties to 💯🎯🇺🇸