Hello and welcome to our Telegram channel! We're excited to have you join us as we share information about our future events, high-quality papers, evidence-based practices, orthodontic tips, and much more. As an orthodontic community, we are committed to providing the best possible care for our patients, and we believe that sharing knowledge and reliable information is an important part of achieving that goal.
Through this channel, we hope to keep you up to date with the latest developments in orthodontics, as well as provide you with practical tips and advice that you can use in your daily practice. Whether you're an experienced practitioner, a student, or simply interested in learning more about orthodontics, we believe that this channel will be a valuable resource for you.
So, once again, welcome to our Telegram channel! We look forward to connecting with you and sharing our passion for orthodontics.
Through this channel, we hope to keep you up to date with the latest developments in orthodontics, as well as provide you with practical tips and advice that you can use in your daily practice. Whether you're an experienced practitioner, a student, or simply interested in learning more about orthodontics, we believe that this channel will be a valuable resource for you.
So, once again, welcome to our Telegram channel! We look forward to connecting with you and sharing our passion for orthodontics.
👍4🔥3
On June 24th we are celebrating the birthday of a great American orthodontist, Charles Henry Tweed.
We invite you to join our study club on this memorial day at 19:00.
Our clinical topic is titled ‘Extraction patterns in Class II patients’.
We will be having a very special online guest, Dr. James Vaden, who has been a course co-director at the Charles H. Tweed International Foundation in Tucson, Arizona since 1979.
Dr. Vaden served from 1999 – 2010 as the Professor and Chairman of the Department of Orthodontics at the University of Tennessee. He is the author of more than 50 articles published in peer reviewed orthodontic journals and has given more than 200 major lectures to national and international groups. He is a recipient of many prestigious orthodontic awards such as Albert H. Ketcham Memorial Award, Louise Ada Jarabak Memorial International Teachers and Research Award, etc.
Dr. Vaden is going to give us a talk and he will also present a few of his cases.
To register for the event, simply follow the link provided: self.payanyway.ru/16859119692897
As always, we are looking for an interesting discussion!
We invite you to join our study club on this memorial day at 19:00.
Our clinical topic is titled ‘Extraction patterns in Class II patients’.
We will be having a very special online guest, Dr. James Vaden, who has been a course co-director at the Charles H. Tweed International Foundation in Tucson, Arizona since 1979.
Dr. Vaden served from 1999 – 2010 as the Professor and Chairman of the Department of Orthodontics at the University of Tennessee. He is the author of more than 50 articles published in peer reviewed orthodontic journals and has given more than 200 major lectures to national and international groups. He is a recipient of many prestigious orthodontic awards such as Albert H. Ketcham Memorial Award, Louise Ada Jarabak Memorial International Teachers and Research Award, etc.
Dr. Vaden is going to give us a talk and he will also present a few of his cases.
To register for the event, simply follow the link provided: self.payanyway.ru/16859119692897
As always, we are looking for an interesting discussion!
(Removable retainers) Do you prescribe full-time or part-time retainer wear?
Final Results
29%
Full-time wear
71%
Night-time wear
0%
Combined wear
Feel free to answer 🥸
Later, we will post the evidence regarding this subject
Later, we will post the evidence regarding this subject
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A randomised clinical trial of thermoplastic retainer wear protocols
E Thickett et al. Eur J Orthod. 2010 Feb.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19828592/
• There was no statistical difference between full-time and part-time uses of thermoplastic retainer
• The degree of relapse is similar in terms of overjet, arch length, inter-molar width, inter-canine width, and irregularity index at any time point.
Asking patients to wear their retainers only during night-time appears to be an acceptable clinical practice.
E Thickett et al. Eur J Orthod. 2010 Feb.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19828592/
• There was no statistical difference between full-time and part-time uses of thermoplastic retainer
• The degree of relapse is similar in terms of overjet, arch length, inter-molar width, inter-canine width, and irregularity index at any time point.
Asking patients to wear their retainers only during night-time appears to be an acceptable clinical practice.
👍4
Here is my blog post from 3 years ago: https://orthodonticgrammar.com/2020/08/18/retention-has-nothing-to-do-with-a-retainer-a-very-personal-opinion/
Orthodontic Grammar
Retention has nothing to do with a retainer. A very personal opinion
I have recently seen online a video introduction by a well-known British orthodontist for his upcoming lecture on retention. And this forced me to write this post. This is true that British researc…
👍5
Good evening everyone! 👋
Recently, a colleague of mine shared this case with me. What do you think happened here?
Share your thoughts with us.
Recently, a colleague of mine shared this case with me. What do you think happened here?
Share your thoughts with us.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥3
When evaluating alignment efficiency and space closure time, which of the following is the most efficient?
Anonymous Poll
0%
Passive Self-ligating brackets
50%
Active Self-ligating brackets
50%
Conventional brackets
A randomized clinical trial compared Self-ligating (active, passive) and conventional brackets in terms of alignment efficiency and space closure. It was concluded that;
1- Time to initial alignment was significantly shorter for the conventional brackets than for either the active or passive self-ligating brackets.
2- There was no statistically significant difference in passive, active, or total space-closure times among the 3 brackets under investigation.
1- Time to initial alignment was significantly shorter for the conventional brackets than for either the active or passive self-ligating brackets.
2- There was no statistically significant difference in passive, active, or total space-closure times among the 3 brackets under investigation.
We’ve just selected two nice cases that James Vaden will be presenting during our meeting on 24 June. There will also be one case from Danny and one from me. Don’t be late to get registered: https://self.payanyway.ru/16859119692897?fbclid=PAAaZd7r48hUHIJasXhAF3RjisSV4iowDCzY9AY1674RRT_UNYxOyE1xJm3R0_aem_th_AX499c1ksE8QJaCIrkwOUSmFWbqS6lhgZ41EhXwEYnSDpsr9DpoyQDjJQ2aOn61PXos
👍3
Please join us on Facebook https://m.facebook.com/groups/629407375790894/
Facebook
MOSG: Moscow Orthodontic Study Group | Facebook