🇷🇺☢️🇺🇳 IAEA’s Grossi Claims Zaporozhye NPP Can’t Be Restarted — Let’s Break That Down

In a statement to Reuters, IAEA head Rafael Grossi claimed that the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) cannot be restarted under current conditions. Here's what he said — and why it doesn’t hold up.

1. Cooling Water — The Only Valid Concern

Grossi: “There’s no water available to cool the reactors.”

This is the only technically sound concern raised. However, the Russians have made it clear they are committed to restarting the plant — and that includes solving the water issue. We are sure they have plans to address this.

2. Electricity Supply — Already Being Addressed

Grossi: “There is no stable electricity supply to the site.”

According to reports, Russia is actively building new power lines to integrate ZNPP into its own energy grid. The process is underway and progressing steadily. This is a temporary issue being resolved — not a permanent obstacle.

3. Equipment Inspection — Not a Problem for the Builders

Grossi: “All systems must be thoroughly checked after three years of inactivity.”

Obvious and expected — but hardly a real obstacle. The Russian specialists who built the damn plant clearly know how to inspect and maintain it. We've seen operations at the site firsthand, so this isn't speculation.

4. Political Certification — A Convenient Excuse

Grossi: “Russian engineers are technically capable, but political certification is an issue.”

Here’s where we agree. The IAEA’s reluctance has nothing to do with safety and everything to do with Western politics. We visited ZNPP just two months ago. Grossi and his team do have access to the facility, but consistently ignore facts that contradict the Western narrative. We've documented this multiple times.

🐻 Grossi, you're a clown — we've said it plenty of times. We even joked about slashing the tires on IAEA vehicles at the plant, but the ZNPP staff wouldn’t let us.

🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising

🇺🇸 “Palantir never collects data to unlawfully surveil Americans.”

They added “unlawfully” because the surveillance is legal. It’s government-approved.

🐻 You'd think a bunch of tech nerds would be smart enough not to drop obvious lawyer-speak in a damage control post.

🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising

🏁⚔️🇷🇺 NATO Satellites Aided SBU Strike on Olenya Airbase

NATO satellites were directly involved in the June 1 Ukrainian sabotage attempt on Russia’s Olenya airbase. Beyond passive surveillance, they assisted the SBU with target intel and planning.

🛰 American TOPAZ military satellites captured 102 detailed images of the Kola Peninsula in the final week of May. Most were high to maximum resolution—enough to pinpoint objects to within meters.

➡️24 images targeted the non-strategic nuclear weapons depot at Bolshoye Ramozero.

➡️20 images were taken of Olenya itself.

➡️Naval bases at Nerpichya (17) and Gadzhiyevo (16) were also heavily surveilled.

➡️11 passes focused on the Kilpyavr airfield and equipment near Murmansk.

✈️ On top of that, US, Norwegian, and Swedish reconnaissance and anti-submarine aircraft—P-8As and a Gulfstream IV SIGINT jet—flew missions near the area in late May.

The June 1 attack failed, but the lesson is clear: the West’s growing satellite and ISR activity is a warning sign. Russia must act before these “monitoring” missions turn into direct strikes.

Via: @Rybar

🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising

🇺🇸🇷🇺 White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated that Trump reserves the right to impose sanctions on Russia and is ready to use them if he deems it necessary.

🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising

🇺🇸🇷🇺 Holy Mother of Gaslighting.

“Look how far we’ve come in these 4 months,” she said.

Yeah — straight toward nuclear war.

🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising

🇺🇸 Honestly, we wish the Trump administration would just drop the act and admit they’re not planning to end the war, so we can go back to "business as usual."

The MAGA crowd should accept they were lied to — but they should be fine with it.

“Make America Great Again” always meant going back. Back to a "better time" of America. Back to the Cold War should work just fine for them.

🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising

🇺🇸🇺🇦 White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated that Trump was not informed in advance by Kiev about plans to strike Russian airbases.

See, now you’ve got a problem Karoline...

Either you knew and helped coordinate the operation — and frankly, the flood of U.S. satellite images over Olenya airbase sure looks like proof of that. Which means you’re lying.

Or you didn’t know — which means Ukraine’s acting without your approval, and you’ve got a client state going rogue, and/or you’re not in control of your own country.

So which is it, Karoline? Lying, or not in control?

🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising

🇺🇸 Spoiler alert. He bent the knee lol...

🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising

🔴 LIVE on Garland Nixon's Stream right now!

https://www.youtube.com/live/cw_Z2JCQ5LQ?si=pJlvNWKUeS4TW3V5

🇪🇺🇮🇱 Public Support for Israel Plummets Across Western Europe

Public sentiment toward Israel has dropped to historic lows across Western Europe, according to the latest YouGov poll. Fewer than 20% of respondents in six key countries expressed a favorable view of the country.

Support for Israel has fallen sharply since the beginning of tracking in 2016. Germany (-44), France (-48), and Denmark (-54) now show record-low net favorability. In Italy (-52) and Spain (-55), the numbers remain at the rock bottom levels first seen in 2021. Even in traditionally more pro-Israel Britain, net favorability stands at -46—just slightly above its all-time low of -49.

Across the board, only 13% to 21% of people in the surveyed countries view Israel positively, while 63% to 70% express a negative opinion. When asked whether Israel’s actions in Gaza are justified, only 6% of Italians and 16% of French respondents agreed—down drastically from last October. In the UK, just 12% supported the military campaign.

Meanwhile, a notable segment of respondents—ranging from 29% in Italy to 40% in Germany—believe that while Israel had the right to act, it went too far, causing unacceptable civilian casualties. In Britain, this view is shared by 38% of respondents. Additionally, between 12% (Germany) and 24% (Italy) said that Israel should never have entered Palestinian territory in the first place.

🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising